Saturday, October 19, 2019

Brief of case U.S v. Kozeny Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Brief of U.S v. Kozeny - Case Study Example Defendant asked that the court determine the substance of appropriate law in Azerbaijan and instruct the jury on particular defenses that might be accessed through the law of Azerbaijan. Reasoning: The Court argued that, though the defendants were relieved from prosecution because the bribery had been properly reported to the authorities, it did not make the action unlawful. Article 171 relieves the payer of prosecution, but not the payment. The defendants showed â€Å"corrupt† intent by consciously paying the officials which made them liable to the law. However, if the defendants provided evidence for â€Å"true extortion† then the Court would instruct the jury to provide exemptions to criminal liability under Article 171. Analysis: The case is significant because it shows that reporting the bribery does not exempt bribers from related criminal charges, unless in cases of â€Å"true extortion.† Defendants of bribery cases cannot easily evade the legal consequences of corrupt bribery

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.